![]() ![]() The clear and intuitive interface, how to use: You can save your results to check history of results ECG Kardiograf and view graphs of your measurements Heart Blood Monitor. “It means that just because the underlying technology works in one app doesn’t mean it works in another one and we can’t assume that all contact heart rate apps are accurate.Cardiograph Heart Rate Monitor - is an application that measures the pulse of your heart, whenever you need !Ĭardiographs calculates the pulse or heart rate using the built-in smartphone sensors and devices (camera, LED flashlight, etc.). “The difference in performance between the contact apps is probably down to the algorithm the app uses to calculate heart rate which is commercially confidential,” Dr. But they found that the variation could not be explained by camera technology (iPhone 4 versus iPhone 5), age, body temperature, or heart rate itself. The researchers tried to find the reason for the difference in performance between the two contact apps. “The one contact app was excellent, performing almost like a medically approved pulse oximeter device, but the other app was not accurate even though they use the same technology,” Dr. One app measured heart rate with comparable accuracy to pulse oximetry, but the other app did not give the correct measurement. Wyss said: “While it’s easy to use the non-contact apps – you just look at your smartphone camera and it gives your heart rate – the number it gives is not as accurate as when you have contact with your smartphone by putting your fingertip on the camera.”īut the performance of the two contact apps was also different. The non-contact apps had a tendency to overestimate higher heart rates.ĭr. The non-contact apps performed less well than the contact apps, particularly at higher heart rates and lower body temperatures. In some apps there were differences of more than 20 beats per minute compared with ECG in over 20% of the measurements. The researchers found substantial differences in accuracy between the four apps. The study included 108 patients who had their heart rates measured by ECG, pulse oximetry, and each app using each phone. These are the electrocardiogram (ECG), which measures the electrical activity of the heart using leads on the chest, and fingertip pulse oximetry, which uses photoplethysmography. Some apps use contact photoplethysmography (touching a fingertip to the phone’s built-in camera), while other apps use non-contact photoplethysmography (camera is held in front of the face).Īccuracy was assessed by comparing the results to the clinical gold standard measurements. This study tested the accuracy of four commercially available heart rate apps (randomly selected) using two phones, the iPhone 4 and iPhone 5. “The problem is that there is no law requiring validation of these apps and, therefore, no way for consumers to know if the results are accurate.” Christophe Wyss, a cardiologist at Heart Clinic Zurich, Switzerland. “Heart rate apps come installed on many smartphones and once people see them it is human nature to use them and compare their results with others,” said one of the authors, Dr. The research is published today in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. Sophia Antipolis, : Consumers are being warned about the accuracy of heart rate apps after a study found huge variability between commercially available apps, even those using the same technology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |